Soterian then expressely maintains that Yahweh is narcissistic! All is for His glory. And the other Yahweh for humanity in the end amounts to the same,because the writers of that anthology present His as not interested in what is best for us.
No Deity has dominion over us anyway! As independent beings, we owe none anything-no worship and obedience. To proclaim otherwise proclaims that might is right.
It ill seves to claim that why, with His omniscience, He'd know more than we and thus would have the right to declare morality and to judge us.As Yahweh sends humanity evils, why would any rational and moral being ever want to serve HIm?
The Atonement bespeaks just blood sacrifice just as evil as that of the Aztecs and others: the innocent should never serve as expiation for the guilty.
Yet, according to that execrable anthology, we break His morality when in many cases,no, we affirm life! The sexual attitude is misanthropic. The commands to stone and the notion of Hell bespeak savagery.
We are not sinners: we do mostly good. None should ever face Hell,even the one of just annihilation,except for the Hitlers.
Universalism, that all eventually go to Heaven cannot overwhelm the fact that the duty of Yahweh was to have put us into a better place in the first place,per Fr. Meslier's the problem of Heaven, that one -way street for Him.
Thus, both Matt Chandler and Mark Stevens err.
No comments:
Post a Comment