The Incarnation & the Trinity

  The Incarnation and the Trinity are part of the mysteries surrounding that Ultimate Mystery that theists claim explains ultimately everything. But as fellow atheologian Keith Parsons explains: " Occult power wielded by a transcendent being in an inscrutable manner for unfathomable purposes does not seem to be any sort of a good answer." God did it means nothing unless theists can give evidence in a general manner for how He does it instead of giving a false assumption. How does He cause natural causes to act.? By the magic of let it be?

    Lamberth's the Malebranche Reductio maintains that Nicholas Malebranche unwittingly reduces to the absurd God as the ultimate answer as his occasionalism states that when we act, ti's God who does the real action!

    This notion of condescension is absurd:  the Incarnation is absurd, because should Yeshua be wholly human, yet not do wrong, he wouldn't wholly human, because we all are born with determinants and acquire determinants that cause us to do wrong. Most people do right most of the time,but none can do good all the time.

    The Trinity is absurd, so Aquinas stands right that it does take faith to accept it. It does no good to use the modal perspective that as water can be a liquid, a gas and a solid so can God be three persons [ Some Christians find modalism wrong.]. Water does not manifest  itself in all three forms at the same time.

     No, ti's theists who enslave themselves to faith that err!

     We have no sensus divinatus- innate knowledge - that God exists and we should follow His commands. We do not deny Him by blinding ourselves to Him, but instead find no evidence or reason to accept His existence, and to postulate Him for our moral sense begs the question. We cannot follow His forked tongue- the thousands of sects who contradict each other on what He commands.

      Paul and the author blaspheme us thereby!

      Theists cannot rebut this whatsoever!