Inerrantists sure know how to do double-talk with their far-fetched rationalizations! Errantists cannot defend their scriptures. Prof. Irwin Corey makes more sense than either.
William Lane Craig and Paul Copan defend the commands for genocide as justice and that the children would be in Heaven. What insouciance and immorality! Fortunately, the Tanakh's account never occurred!
Just what are those excellent metaphors for the egregious scriptural passages that errantists ever find?
Both sides cannot meet rational criteria for authencating that rubbish!
What do you say?
No comments:
Post a Comment